An in-house IS training exercise leads to reconfiguration of boundary systems. Which has the ISSMP effectively implemented?

The effective implementation indicated by the scenario pertains to resource management. When an in-house IS training exercise leads to the reconfiguration of boundary systems, it suggests a focus on optimizing and managing the resources associated with information systems in a way that enhances their security posture and operational efficiency.

Resource management encompasses the allocation and efficient use of an organization’s assets, including personnel, technologies, and processes. By conducting training and subsequently reconfiguring boundary systems, the organization is actively managing its resources to ensure that they are aligned with its security objectives, which is a fundamental aspect of the ISSMP role. Training personnel not only enhances their skills but also ensures that they are equipped to manage the systems effectively, demonstrating a comprehensive approach to resource allocation and utilization.

The other options, while relevant to information systems security management, do not directly correlate with the act of reconfiguring boundary systems as a result of training. Risk management typically involves identifying, assessing, and controlling risks rather than focusing on the direct allocation of resources. Value determination relates more to assessing the worth of information assets and could apply indirectly, but it does not capture the essence of the training and subsequent actions described. Assurance integration refers to aligning security assurances across various layers of the organization, which, while important, is