What is an inappropriate method for evaluating personnel for security risks?

In evaluating personnel for security risks, it is essential to rely on methods that effectively identify potential vulnerabilities that may affect the security posture of an organization. Passport number verification and validation does not directly assess an individual's behavior, character, or reliability in a professional context related to security risks. Instead, it primarily confirms identity and travel eligibility, which is less relevant for evaluating someone's trustworthiness or suitability for roles that involve sensitive information or security responsibilities.

In contrast, elements such as a driving record review, drug and substance testing, and verification of education, licensing, and certification are more pertinent to security assessments. Driving records can reveal risky behaviors that may correlate with reliability, while drug testing can identify substance abuse that could impair judgment or performance. Additionally, validating someone's education and professional credentials ensures that they possess the necessary qualifications and ethical grounding for their role.

Overall, employing ineffective methods for assessing security risks, such as passport verification, fails to provide a meaningful evaluation of an individual's propensity for risk-related behavior in their job functions.